Meghan Markle would have forbidden Prince Harry to take his children to see King Charles III

When Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle left the British royal crown to live in the United States, they gave up all the benefits they would have from being part of the crown, but apparently they wanted to have a freer life outside the country.

It is not yet known what status Prince Harry really has with his family, but apparently, the decision not to be part of the crown is very serious, since not even the children would not be part of their lives.

Meghan Markle would have forbidden Prince Harry to take his children to see King Charles III.

Meghan Markle would have made the decision not to let her children follow the royal path, as apparently one of her family rules next to her husband, is that children can not be part of that world, and that would include taking them to see the father of the prince, King Charles III.

According to the Spanish newspaper “El Nacional de Cataluña”, in response to statements in the British press, the Duchess of Sussex would continue her stance of prohibiting her children, Princes Archie and Lilibet, from having any kind of relationship with their grandfather, King Charles III.

A source close to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex had previously mentioned that the King was able to see his grandchildren via video calls on occasion. However, to this day, he has not met in person little Lilibet Diana, born in the United States in 2021.

On September 7, the British portal GB News reported that neither Harry nor Charles III intended to meet during the Duke’s seasonal visit to the UK.